By Ian Booth, PGY-1 Pharmacy Practice Resident,
University of Maryland Medical Center
The idea of
learning and cognitive development across different generations is a difficult
concept to assess, given the multitude of digital technologies that are
accessible. In the current educational system, there is a need for separation
of what could be considered as two different groups: new millennium learners
(NMLs) and old millennium learners (OMLs).1 Through my experience in
higher education, with a wide range of learners, finding differences between
their development, in what could be identified as the “mobile age”, can be very
important. Learning is now heavily dependent on mobile devices, such as phones,
tablets, audio players, etc., and the OMLs may be at a significant
disadvantage.1 In my experience through the educational system, I
have seen this transition into technology dependence. In this blog, I will be
discussing ways in which mobile learning has progressed over time.
Accessibility
I believe the first issue
that needs to be addressed before focusing on the idea of incorporating mobile
learning into an educational theory is the accessibility of electronics. In a
survey in 2003 in the UK, they found that over 75% of the population, and 90%
of young adults owned mobile devices.2 This may overestimate the
general population, especially in different areas of the world with less
socioeconomic capabilities.1 Not all learners have the means to use
these types of devices through their education, which can make their learning
more difficult. With the cost of electronics increasing year after year, during
a time where the learners are not able to support themselves, can cause
significant impacts to their growth. Although many people may incorporate this
idea of learning into their everyday routine, the lack of accessibility can
impact someone else’s ability to reach those same expectations.
Is
technology mobile, or the learner?
Although we know that
technology has advanced progressively over time, and most likely will continue
to do so, consideration into the learners schedule is an important concept.
People are continuously on the move throughout the day, thus learning takes
place all the time. The idea of classroom only learning is no longer
applicable, and is something that OMLs may not be used too.1 With
the variety of access to mobile devices, NMLs are able to take learning and
organization to a completely different level, and thus are at an advantage.
I think a key example of
this is the use of Google and the internet. Researching the answer to a
question is now at the tip of our fingers, with a quick search online, where
this was not always possible. Learning the answer to a question required a
book, which usually required a library. Now the library is right in our
technology, whenever we need it.3 As for organization, now we have
the capability to have an up to date calendar, integrated within your own
schedule, but also other peoples as well, in order to know exactly what is
planned at all times. Calendars can be linked to phones, computers, tablets and
desktops, making accessibility easier than ever before. This allows learning to
be incorporated into all activities of daily life, which also compliments the
idea of formal education.1 Having access to “mobile learning” is a
concept that OMLs have had to become used to, where NMLs were raised in a world
of this being second nature.1 This can be a difficult concept to
grasp for many OMLs.
Relationship
of Mobile Learning to Cognitive Development
One of the
statements from the authors that I felt explained the use of this concept the
best was, “mobile learning can be an opportunity to bridge the gulf between
formal and experiential learning, opening new possibilities for personal
fulfilment and lifelong learning.”1 Creating this bridge between
education that is moving toward a “mobile age” and incorporating it into lifelong
learning is something that sticks out the most with this concept. In a
profession like pharmacy, where continuous learning is the most important thing
we can do, incorporating both mobile and lifelong learning into our daily lives
is extremely important, yet also very challenging to do. The practice of
pharmacy is an evolving field, just like the theories of education, and I think
that combining these aspects of mobile and lifelong learning into our daily
lives, as well as understanding the deficits that certain learners may
experience with them, will make us better practitioners, educators, and also
learners throughout our whole careers.
References
1.
Taylor J. Digital Technologies and Cognitive Development. Paper Presented at MLEARN 2005. Accessed August 26, 2018.
2.
Crabtree J, Nathan M & Roberts S. MobileUK: Mobile phones and everyday life,
2003. London: The Work Foundation; 1-53.
3.
Sharples M. Learning As Conversation:
Transforming Education in the Mobile Age. In Proceedings of Conference on Seeing, Understanding, Learning in the
Mobile Age, 2005; 147-152.
No comments:
Post a Comment