Flipping
the Classroom: Pharmacy Education Perspectives
By
Jesse Rungkitwattanakul PharmD
Pharmacy
Practice Resident, Georgetown University Hospital
“Flipping
the classroom” has become an interesting topic for discussion in the past
several years among educators. A generation is “a group of individuals
belonging to a specific category at the same time”1. Their shared
experiences and stories greatly influence the way the learner processes
information. Academia currently involves the coexistence of several generations
including traditionalists, Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y, and
each generation has a unique teaching and learning method/style1. In
the classroom, it is often common to see the oldest generation (the professor)
instructing the youngest generation (the pharmacy students), creating a
generation gap. Because of the different teaching and learning styles
associated with the generations, this gap can be an obstacle to both teaching
and learning. Therefore, the flipped classroom may be a way to bridge that gap.
What is
the flipped classroom?
The
flipped classroom approach has been used for several years in a variety of
disciplines, notably within the humanities and social sciences. This method
encourages students to gain first-exposure learning prior to class and focus on
processing part of learning such as synthesizing, analyzing, problem solving in
class through guidance from the instructor. To ensure that learners complete
the preparation necessary for productive class time, the assignment-based
model, in which learners have to produce or brainstorm work before coming to
class is proposed. With the appropriate preparation from home, the learners
receive productive feedback through the process or activity performed in class.
This reduces the need for the instructor to provide extensive background
teaching and allows the student to achieve a higher level of comprehension2.
A successful flipped classroom should have three goals: (1) allow the students
to become critical thinkers, (2) fully engage students and instructors, and (3)
stimulate the development of a deep understanding of the material.
Does
the “flipped classroom” work?
What
are the evidences to support the use the pharmacy education?
Koo
et al conducted a study determining whether a flipped classroom design would
improve student performance and perceptions of the learning experience compared
to traditional lecture course design in a required pharmacotherapy course for
second-year pharmacy students3. Students viewed short online videos
about the fundamental concepts and answered self-assessment questions prior to
face-to-face sessions involving patient case discussions. By comparing before
and after, the final grades of an A or B were more prevalent after the
implementation as compared to before (88% vs. 67%, p=0.005). Additionally, the
study conducted by William Prescott et al also showed a similar trend, in which
the program implementation resulted in the higher course grades in the
intervention group as compared to the traditional classroom setting (90.3% vs.
85.8%, p<0.001)4.
On
the other hand, regarding the student’s perception, Khanova et al reported some
interesting key aspect from the learner’s perspective5. The
researchers evaluated students’ perception of the flipped classroom on a required
pharmacotherapy course by giving students pre-course and post-course surveys. Before
the course, the vast majority of students in the study sample (72%) expressed
preference for traditional lecture by the professors over flipped classroom. When
students were asked at the conclusion of the course whether they preferred
coming to class to listen to a professor lecture or learning the basic content
prior to class and using class time for applied learning, 83% indicated that
they preferred the former. Regarding the free text answers, comments indicating
preference for traditional lecture, such as “I would much rather come to class
and be lectured” were common, but many students stated they liked “the idea” of
“learning concepts prior to class” and using class time for discussion and
other forms of active learning. The main critical perspective regarding the
overall course design was under the perception of time-consuming activity as
seen as “With all of our other classes, I did not have time to read the large
amount of material before each class. This made class time very confusing and
unproductive”. This study essentially highlights practical challenges of
implementing a flipped learning model. Student feedback informed potential
redesign of the course and the development of a more effective model for pharmacy
education.
Conclusions
The
flipped classroom is a useful alternative to the traditional classroom. It is a
method that embraces students' need for active learning in a group setting
while maintaining the traditional classroom method for introducing the didactic
information. Active learning increases student engagement and can lead to
improved retention of material as demonstrated on standard examinations. However,
the program must be cautiously implemented since it requires a significantly
higher amount of preparation prior to class.
References
1.
Berret D. How “flipping the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The
Chronical of Higher Education 2012: [cited 2017 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857
2.
Rotellar C, Cain J. Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing
the Flipped Classroom. Am J Pharm Educ 2016; 80(2): 34. [cited 2017 Oct 15].
Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827585
3.
Koo CL, Demps EL, Farris C, Bowman JD, Panahi L, Boyle P. Impact of Flipped
Classroom Design on Student Performance and Perceptions in a Pharmacotherapy
Course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Mar 25; 80(2): 33. [cited 2017 Oct 15]. Available
from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827584
4.
Prescott WA, Woodruff A, Prescott GM, Albanese N, Bernhardi C, et al.
Introduction and Assessment of a Blended-Learning Model to Teach Patient
Assessment in a Doctor of Pharmacy Program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Dec
25;80(10):176. [cited 2017 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289732
5.
Khanova J, McLaughlin JE, Rhoney DH, Roth MT, Harris S. Student Perceptions of
a Flipped Pharmacotherapy Course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Nov 25;79(9):1. [cited
2017 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727361/
No comments:
Post a Comment