By Melissa Fiscus, Pharm.D.
PGY-1 Pharmacy Practice Resident
Howard County General Hospital
Almost
every day in any student’s educational career, students are assessed on
correctness. In elementary school, students are asked to recite the alphabet
and perform simple addition. As the years progress, students are assessed on
spelling, grammar, complex mathematical formulas, and reading comprehension.
Frequently, students are given tests to determine how well they have mastered
the topic. In the end, students receive a grade for their efforts, which is a
permanent record of how much they did (or didn’t) learn about a topic.
Making
mistakes and overcoming failure are natural elements of the learning process
for students; however, this culture of regular testing can limit their
development. Recently, I read an article by Jeff Cain entitled “The
Consequences of Never Being Wrong” which wondered if pharmacy schools permitted
safe failure; e.g. the idea that
students could fail and learn from their mistakes without affecting their
grades. As I read this article, I found myself agreeing wholeheartedly with
what Cain described. Frequent testing has conditioned students to do everything
to avoid being wrong. Students avoid taking learning risks due to the negative
outcomes of failure. For example, if students are wrong on exams, it could
hinder their selection to a competitive residency position. If a student is
wrong during a class discussion, they might receive a sharp remark from the
instructor or snide comments from their classmates. If students are wrong on an
academic presentation, they might experience public criticism, embarrassment,
and/or a poor grade.1
With
all this negativity associated with failure, it’s no surprise that students do
everything to avoid being wrong. This is okay, to some extent, because students
must be able to perform their jobs correctly to ensure patient safety. However,
Cain notes that an overemphasis on avoiding mistakes comes at the expense of
creating better learners.1 Students may be too scared to voice their
questions because they fear the negative consequences of being incorrect.
However, when this occurs critical learning opportunities are lost. Good
students aren’t the ones who simply know all the facts, they are the ones who
know how to critically examine problems and come up with new solutions. If we
discourage those students from speaking up, everyone in the classroom loses the
benefit of that conversation.
This concept of open communication and
exchange of knowledge relates directly to the constructivism theory of
learning. Constructivism views learning as an active, constantly ongoing
process. In this theory, the educator is viewed not as an instructor, but as a
guide who facilitates learning. Constructivists believe that learning builds
upon existing knowledge, and students must be asked to make connections between
what they already know to gain new knowledge.2 In classrooms that
utilize the constructivism theory of learning, students are able to ask
questions, recognize their misconceptions, and learn from their mistakes in a
positive learning environment.
As educators, we must try not to stifle these
creative conversations by engaging in a little constructivism ourselves. A
recent study by Tulis et al. described the error management behaviors used by
teachers in classrooms and how it influenced their students. In this study, the
authors noted that students’ attitudes toward mistakes are associated with how
their teachers manage and respond to mistakes.3 At the conclusion of
this study, the authors describe four teacher-specific error management
behaviors instructors can utilize to create a positive error culture within
their classroom. First, instructors must be willing to acknowledge and discuss
students’ mistakes. Second, student errors must be regarded as learning
opportunities rather than as negative indicators for performance. Third,
instructors must be patient and allow the student to correct the error by him
or herself. Finally, instructors should not express annoyance or ridicule
students if they make an error.3 Utilization of these techniques
will allow students to explain their thought processes, gain confidence, and allow
instructors to better understand what caused their miscomprehension in the
first place.
Another strategy for creating a positive
error culture is providing students with many opportunities to fail safely. In
order to fully grasp difficult concepts, students may need multiple opportunities
to be wrong in order to receive proper instructional feedback that helps them solidify
their knowledge. Cain offers some suggestions in his article, including frequent
quizzes, audience response system questions, case/problem solving activities,
and personal problem sets.1 Inclusion of these strategies allows
instructors to feature low-stakes learning opportunities that have little
impact on student grades, but can have a large impact on student comprehension.
As educators, it’s important we don’t
equate correctness with true learning. At the conclusion of pharmacy school, we
want our students to be knowledgeable clinicians, critical thinkers, and
creative problem solvers. Unfortunately, these skills can’t always be learned
from reading a textbook or choosing the correct answer on a test. As Cain
reminds us at the end of his article, “School should not be a place where
students are expected to be right most of the time. School should be a place
where you learn to be right. Teaching students how to
be right might just mean letting them be wrong even more.”1
References:
1. Cain J. The Consequences of Never
Being Wrong [Internet]. Pulses. 2017. Available from: https://cptlpulses.com/2017/06/22/consequencesneverwrong/
2. Kaufman DM. Applying educational
theory in practice. BMJ 2003; 326: 213-216.
3. Tulis M. Error management behavior in
classrooms: Teachers’ responses to student mistakes. Teach Teach Educ. 2013;
33: 56-68. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X13000255
No comments:
Post a Comment